Friday, September 25, 2009

Head Coverings??

Not too long ago, I met an acquaintance that attends a Plymouth Brethren church. I had been looking for a church to attend, and so I looked into this denomination to see what they were about. As I was reading I found that the women all wore head coverings to church. Their reasons were based mostly on the scriptures found in 1 Corinthians 11. The verses are as follows:

"2Now I commend you because you remember me in everything and maintain the traditions even as I delivered them to you. 3But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God. 4Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head, 5but every wife who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head, since it is the same as if her head were shaven. 6For if a wife will not cover her head, then she should cut her hair short. But since it is disgraceful for a wife to cut off her hair or shave her head, let her cover her head. 7For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man. 8For man was not made from woman, but woman from man. 9Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. 10That is why a wife ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels.11Nevertheless in the Lord woman is not independent of man nor man of woman; 12for as woman was made from man, so man is now born of woman. And all things are from God. 13Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a wife to pray to God with her head uncovered? 14Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is a disgrace for him, 15but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For her hair is given to her for a covering."

Now it seemed to me at this point that the scriptures were very clear. We are supposed to wear a head covering! But when? What does it look like? What exactly IS this head covering!!?? If God wants us to wear it.... where are all those details explaining clearly the guidelines of this head covering?? And so I did some searches online, to see what others had discovered about these verses and I listened to a pastor that does vs. by vs. bible teaching where I used to attend church, and I wasn't satisfied with their reasons why women don't need to wear a physical head covering. Some important facts that I did learn in my search were that, historically, a prostitute would wear her hair short (shorn or shaven) and that if you assume the head covering is a woman's hair the verses no longer make sense. So, the reason to have long hair was probably to distinguish a woman from a prostitute. However, long hair all by itself isn't the covering the verses are referring to. Still, I felt like I didn't have a clear answer.

I let the whole subject go, for the most part. But every once in awhile I would think on it, and wonder if we were mistaken to be seemingly disregarding scripture just because it didn't fit into our social mores and comfort zone. Is scripture no longer relevent to us if it isn't culturally relevent? I hope not!

Once, a long while back, I heard a pastor say that the best commentary on the Bible, is the Bible itself! And in this situation, that really proved to be true! I was reading in 1 Peter 3, not too long ago, and I came across these verses:

1Likewise, wives, be subject to your own husbands, so that even if some do not obey the word, they may be won without a word by the conduct of their wives, 2when they see your respectful and pure conduct. 3 Do not let your adorning be external—the braiding of hair and the putting on of gold jewelry, or the clothing you wear— 4but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which in God’s sight is very precious. 5For this is how the holy women who hoped in God used to adorn themselves, by submitting to their own husbands, 6as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord. And you are her children, if you do good and do not fear anything that is frightening. (italics are mine)

I saw so many similarities in the verses that I could not ignore! I was very excited, because I felt like God was really giving me an answer to something that had been weighing on me. I truly felt like the Holy Spirit was communicating something very special to me.

Here I want to say that when reading scripture, be sure not to miss the main point that the verses are trying to make. The main point of these verses is submission, a wife's submission to her husband, and her husband's submission to Christ. If we replace the physical "head covering", with a spiritual covering of our heads... meaning our husband is our cover over our head, and Christ is the covering over our husband's heads, the verses still make sense, and the main point is not lost. As a matter of fact, the point is driven deeper, and the verses make better sense.

I looked up the original word for "adorn" in 1 Peter 3, in the greek lexicon, and that is exactly what it means: to adorn, embellish. But interestingly it also means to "put in order". Which supports this idea even further. We are to put ourselves in the proper order. Now in 1 Corinthians when it says that a woman might as well shave her head, they seem to be saying that you might as well be a prostitute if your husband isn't your head, or if you aren't submitting to him. And when the verses refer to a man covering his head being a disgrace to his head (his head being Christ), it is possibly referring to a covering other than Jesus... such as his wife! Or anyone/thing else for that matter.

And what about this "symbol of authority" that should be on our heads from 1 Corinthians 11:10? The King James version is more accurate, and leaves out the word symbol and has only the word "power"and the original word is actually "exousia" and it means, authority, jurisdiction, liberty, power, right, strength. The original greek simply says "Therefore, it is our duty as a married woman to wear this authority on our head because of the angels". Well, that's my crude translation of the original Greek! But of course, I am definitely not a learned translator of the Bible! And I wonder what the angels have to do with it all?.....We'll leave that for another time and blog!

So, when a woman is covered by the proper "head", her husband, she is his glory. Just as when a man is doing the will of God, submitting to Christ, he is the glory of God. How would a physical hat or covering of some sort glorify her husband? And how would a hat or head covering for a man be a disgrace to Christ?

Now I am not saying that wearing a physical head covering to show submission to your spouse and obedience to the scriptures is bad or wrong. It very well could be a physical outshowing of a heart response. However, I don't really believe that it is what the scriptures are asking of us. We could wear a head covering until we are covered like a muslim in a burka, but if our hearts are wrong.... it is useless. Our hearts are what matter. We must have a gentle and quiet spirit. We must submit to our husband's as our head.

I would love to hear anyone else's thoughts, opinions, hearts, research, etc, on the matter. But please no haters! I am on a lifelong journey of seeking the will and heart of my Father. And I don't claim to be wise or have it all figured out. I was just excited to share a piece of my story. :)

6 comments:

  1. Wow Chaundra! I love your research and yes it does make sense to me! How glorious that God would give understanding through His word about His word, and drive home such a pivital point for us women: showing respect to our husbands as the authority that God voted in over us! He knows what He's doing, and is honored by our honoring of our own husbands. Timely, inspiring, helpful word for me. Thanks GF!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I loved that! I've always wondered about that too. xoxoxo to you! Miss you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you Chaundra! I too, have pondered what that all means, but unlike you, have never taken the time to research it. The Bible really is the best authority on itself and thank you for prayerfully discovering an answer. Heather

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hmm. Yes indeed. A proper order.
    The first thing that strikes me is that in verses 4, 5, and 6 we see that no matter the person, man or woman, they have a head. Literally. But that head is a symbol for a being that has authority over it. The head of a man , being the connection to Jesus should not be covered as Jesus has the authority over him. While a woman's role is to cover her head as her authority figure is the man. If she shaves her head then it is the same as giving authority to another man (or another god) just as a prostitute never has one authority figure and is recognized as a prostitute by her shorter hair. The culture recognized a prostitute a certain way and it seems to say that a wife and husband can be recognized in a similar way by the rules being set a side here. I tend to beleive that a womans hair is symbolic of a man. Ironically if a man has long hair he takes on the role of the woman as one who has a covering that is not Jesus. So hair and coverings really ARE the expression of authority and roles for us as believers.

    As for whether we should honor these traditions today I say no. If you read on in the chapter you see that the next issue is what hunger and the breaking of bread have to do with another. It is obvious to me that the issue is the communion and that those who eat out of hunger need to stay home as they miss the real meaning of the communion. Communion has the real purpose of redemption and forgiveness and not the quenching of hunger.

    I see that the head covering issue is directly related to the times in which these verses speak to. If you lived during those times you'd know that anyone who espoused these actions was doing them to define their loyalties. Whether to God, or to husband (and ultimately to Christ) the real issue was that the culture needed to see the clarity so they could see the love these husbands and wives had for each other and God. Pretty cool stuff. I think though, that our western culture doesn't really need these rules today. But your analysis is killer and I absolutely agree with it!

    The "angel" bit is interesting. It is almost as if the angels knew something about authority and how it might work between two beings who were not created the same. (I didn't say equal, mind you)
    Perhaps they knew satan would use Adam to render Eve useless if Adam had all the power. Hence, Satan seems to gravitate to Eve at the tree of knowledge because she has this power. Chances are that if Adam had been the only one to screw up their might not have been a humanity at all. Eve would have died sinless but Adam might have had so much power he thought himself autonomous from God. Procreation would have no purpose if he found he had all the power. Maybe the angels knew of Satans plan after satan fell from God's favor.

    Geez....I dunno.

    "HUSBANDS LOVE YOUR WIVES!!!"

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oops... I didn't explain the section about the communion very well.

    Basically what I meant was that if you do things for any other reason besides the reason God gives you then you are doing them in vain. Communion is meant for redemption and forgiveness, not quenching hunger and the head-covering is for defining who you are as a man or woman in the church. To use it in today's context makes no sense as we don't live by the same rules they did back then concerning separating ourselves from the prostitutes and/or unmarried people.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey Chaundra,
    I went on that exact same journey YEARS ago!!! Only you researched it much more thoroughly than I did! :) However; I came to the SAME CONCLUSION as you did. It's a heart matter.
    April

    ReplyDelete